British MP: Cyprus peace prevails due to UK troops
Taken from this week's issue.
By ELTAN HALİL
THERE is peace in Cyprus because of the UK’s presence on the island, a senior British MP appeared to suggest during a debate on Afghanistan.
Thomas Tugendhat, chair of the UK Parliament’s Foreign Affairs Committee, referred to Cyprus in an emotive speech to a packed House of Commons on Wednesday in which he said that it is “not armies that win wars” but “patience”.
“We know that patience wins,” he said. “We know it because we have achieved it; we know it because we have delivered it. The cold war was won with patience; Cyprus is at peace, with patience; South Korea, with more than 10 times the number of troops that America had in Afghanistan, is prosperous through patience. So let us stop talking about forever wars. Let us recognise that forever peace is bought, not cheaply, but hard, through determination and the will to endure. The tragedy of Afghanistan is that we are swapping that patient achievement for a second fire and a second war.”
Ahead of the debate Mr Tugendhat, a Conservative MP, wrote in an article for the New Statesman that US President Joe Biden had “abandoned” the Afghan people while Britain stood “idly by”.
In the article he used the example of Cyprus to back up his argument, writing: “Walking out of Germany in 1950 would have resulted in a newly reformed Wehrmacht steamrolled by Soviet troops.
“Leaving Cyprus today would risk another explosion of violence on the Green Line. Instead of pulling out, we stayed in both.”
In an article published in The Times about how the UK remains “impotent in the face of US policy” Mr Tugenhadt also referred to the island when he said that Britain should “highlight the strategic patience we have displayed in Cyprus and Estonia”.
Mr Tugenhadt’s suggestion that there is no fighting in Cyprus because of the presence of British troops is likely to raise eyebrows in the TRNC and Turkey.
While the UK is a “guarantor” of Cyprus and maintains sovereign bases areas on the island, it refused to join Turkey to intervene following the Greek-backed coup on July 15, 1974, to unite the island with Greece, and the attacks on the Turkish Cypriot population.
Former MP Michael Stephen wrote in a 2004 report that in 1976 the UK House of Commons Select Committee on Cyprus found that Turkey had proposed joint Anglo-Turkish action in 1974, but that the Labour government at the time “refused to take any effective action, even though they had troops and aircraft in the Sovereign Bases in Cyprus”.
The Select Committee concluded that “Britain had a legal right to intervene, she had a moral obligation to intervene [but] she did not intervene for reasons which the Government refuses to give.”
Br HeverWhen will these govt's in the UK realise that the treaty they signed when Cyprus was divided in 1974 is out of date just like the Labour party at that time was ill advised. Isolating the TRNC goes against all the ex-pats wishes that it can be resolved, some live there and have properties there. C/mon you lot in parliament pull your socks up and let the Turkish people of Cyprus have a decent living. This island suffered then and is still suffering due to the lack of people in powerful places having no balls to speak out or try to bring this debacle to an end. Both Turks and Greeks still live together in this part of Cyprus, so why not get them round the table, after all both sides committed atrocities during these trouble and I am sure they both want it sorted.